Life cycle embodied energy analysis of higher education buildings: A comparison between different LCI methodologies

V. Venkatraj and M.K. Dixit

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, vol. 144, issue C

Abstract: Nearly half of the global annual energy supply is consumed by the building construction sector, indicating an enormous potential to minimize the carbon footprint. During its life cycle, a building consumes energy in the form of embodied and operational energy. Embodied energy (EE) is expended in processes during construction (ex: extraction of raw material, transportation, manufacturing, etc.). Operating energy (OE) is spent on operating and maintaining the building to ensure occupant comfort. Unlike OE, the methods used to calculate EE are complex, unstandardized, and time-consuming. Each EE calculation method utilizes different sources of data and system boundary definitions, therefore making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate building life cycle energy (LCE). Literature suggests that the disaggregated input-output based hybrid (IOH) approach is more accurate, complete, and reliable in comparison to the other EE calculation methods. In this study, we examine the EE-OE relationship by calculating EE factors for a newly constructed and renovated educational building. Next, we also compare the variation in EE factors across different life cycle inventory (LCI) methods (process-based, aggregated IOH, and disaggregated IOH). The results of this study indicate that using different LCI techniques to calculate EE causes massive variations in EE factors, which represent the EE expense of saving one unit of OE. The findings of our study and literature review show that the process-based approach underestimates EE, therefore the values of EE factors calculated using this approach need to be interpreted with caution. These results further elucidate the importance of standardizing the EE calculation method.

Keywords: Embodied energy; Operating energy; Life cycle energy; Educational buildings; Trade-offs; Renovation; Hybrid method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121002495
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:144:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121002495

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110957

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().