Implications of regional N2O–N emission factors on sugarcane ethanol emissions and granted decarbonization certificates

João Luís Nunes Carvalho, Bruna Gonçalves Oliveira, Heitor Cantarella, Matheus Ferreira Chagas, Leandro Carolino Gonzaga, Késia Silva Lourenço, Ricardo Oliveira Bordonal and Antonio Bonomi

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, vol. 149, issue C

Abstract: Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by substituting fossil fuels depends on how biofuels are produced and how emissions are calculated. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from synthetic and organic N fertilizers are important sources of GHG from sugarcane ethanol. This study aimed to synthesize the literature information and derive regional N2O emissions factors (EFs) for N fertilizers according to Tier 2 approach. This study also evaluated how the use of Tier 2 affects emissions compared with those obtained by the IPCC Tier 1. Moreover, this study examined how N fertilizers can affect GHG emissions and the earning of decarbonization certificates (CBIOs) by ethanol producers. For an ethanol distillery producing 339 million liters annually, the use of Tier 1 and Tier 2 resulted in emissions of 176.5 and 145.2 Gg CO2eq, whereas for the same amount of energy, gasoline would emit 661.8 Gg CO2eq. The addition of nitrification inhibitors (NIs) to N fertilizers and improvements in vinasse/fertilizer management further reduced emissions compared with Tier 2. In Tier 1, the GHG emission savings would result 485,270 CBIOs, worth 4.85 million US$ at US$10 per CBIO. But if the IPCC Tier 2 is considered, the annual CBIOs would be worth 5.17 million US$. Using NIs and improving vinasse/fertilizer management may bring an additional US$ 31,700 and US$ 48,000 revenue above that of Tier 2. Public and sectorial policies behind decarbonization certificates can encourage farmers and decision-makers to pursue more efficient and economical solutions to further decrease GHG emissions and improve the sustainability of ethanol.

Keywords: Tier 2 IPCC methodology; Nitrogen fertilizers; Ethanol biorefinery; Life cycle assessment; CBIOs; RenovaBio policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121007061
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s1364032121007061

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111423

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().