Investigation of the effect of equal and unequal feeding time intervals on process stability and methane yield during anaerobic digestion grass silage

Uchenna Egwu, Kennedy Onyelowe, Shamas Tabraiz, Emmanuel Johnson and Alexander D. Mutshow

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, vol. 158, issue C

Abstract: The effects of equal and unequal feeding intervals, organic loading rates (OLR) and operating temperatures on specific methane production (SMP) during the anaerobic digestion (AD) process were investigated using three pairs of continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs). The Pair 1, 2 and 3 CSTRs were operated at psychrophilic (25 ± 2 °C), mesophilic (40 ± 3 °C) and thermophilic (60 ± 2.5 °C) conditions, respectively. After acclimatization, the reactors were fed at an OLR of 1.0 and 1.5gVS/L.d at selected intervals, while maintaining their pH 6.8–7.2 with NH4HCO3 solution. The results showed that during uneven feeding regime (day 8–93), the mean SMP from Pair 1, 2 and 3 reactors were 294.5, 433.5 and 370.2 N mLCH4/gVS fed, respectively. At failing state (day 60–93), the mean concentrations of free ammonia nitrogen (FAN) in the psychrophilic, mesophilic and thermophilic CSTRs were 19.1, 33.7 and 127.2 mg/L; VFAs of 6940.1, 6852.3 and 4694.9 mg HAc/L; which reduced their SMPs to 140, 273.8 and 231.1 N mLCH4/gVS, respectively. Therefore, uneven feeding, trace elements (TEs) deficiency, VFAs accumulation and FAN (for thermophilic) led to CSTRs failure. An even (24-hourly) feeding regime with daily biomass ash-extracts supplement enhanced the recovery of the failed CSTRs. Although, uneven daily feeding conditions led to AD process instability, it favoured SMP in mesophilic CSTRs compared to psychrophilic and thermophilic. These results strongly indicate that the soluble TEs and alkalinity contained in ash-extracts facilitated the recovery of the failed AD reactors and therefore can be used to revive failed AD processes.

Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Feeding time intervals; Operating temperature; Perennial ryegrass; Specific methane production; Supplements (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122000223
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122000223

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112092

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().