Enhancing renewable and sustainable energy development based on an options-based policy evaluation framework: Case study of wind energy technology in Taiwan

Shun-Chung Lee and Li-Hsing Shih

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, vol. 15, issue 5, 2185-2198

Abstract: Global warming and climate change have shifted the focus of industrial development towards low-carbon renewable energy (RE), as evidence by global efforts to develop RE-based sustainable energy policies. However, the generally cost-ineffective nature of RE investments explains continued governmental subsidies and draft assistance measures to encourage related industrial development, reduce research and development (R&D) costs, and increase innovativeness. Besides measures to accelerate supply and reduced demand for energy, sustainable energy policies must enact thoroughly planned legal and regulatory mechanisms. Notable examples of establishing a legal basis for a low-carbon society in Taiwan include the Energy Management Act, Renewable Energy Development Bill, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act (Draft), and Energy Tax Act (Draft). However, such legislative efforts occasionally conflict or compete with each other, warranting further integration. Additionally, RE technologies are characterized by high R&D costs, long-term planning, and high investment risks. Therefore, based on global trends in wind power development and related policy planning, this study analyzes the feasibility of implementing management strategies in the development process and the correlations between such strategies. Additionally, the achievements, polices, functions, mechanisms, promotion measures, and future plans for related renewable and sustainable energy laws in Taiwan is thoroughly reviewed. An options-based policy evaluation framework is also constructed based on governmental administrative considerations. Moreover, the characteristics of options that lead to unforeseen circumstances during the planning of RE development policies are discussed, allowing us to derive real-time response measures with a decision-making value. Results of this study provide a valuable reference for governmental efforts to evaluate the merits and limitations of related policies concisely, ultimately facilitating the formulation of RE development policies.

Keywords: Low-carbon; Renewable; energy; Sustainable; energy; Policy; evaluation; Policy; planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364-0321(11)00026-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:5:p:2185-2198

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().