EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A review of conventional and alternative cementitious materials for geothermal wells

Sophia L. Bergen, Lyn Zemberekci and Sriramya Duddukuri Nair

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, vol. 161, issue C

Abstract: Geothermal energy is a promising alternative to conventional fossil-based energy sources. Geothermal reservoirs are pools of water heated by magma deep below the Earth's crust, the steam of which can be used to power turbines or pass through heat pumps. Recovering this heat to the surface requires construction and subsequent cementation of subsurface geothermal wells. The conditions to which the cemented annulus is exposed are frequently harsher and more extreme than that of oil and gas wells. Cement slurries used in geothermal wells are vulnerable to acidic and carbon dioxide-rich brine and temperatures above 500 °C. Overall, well failure is a consequence of degradation of cemented annuli and cracking due to exposure to these severe conditions. This literature review addresses the durability problems associated with the use of inadequate cementing materials for such harsh conditions. New alternative cementitious formulations that have been developed in response to the weaknesses of conventional cementing materials are discussed. Relevant studies are compiled and broken into main sections such as current cementing methods and challenges, alternative cementitious materials, monitoring systems, and environmental impact. This work introduces a thorough analysis of materials from the early 1950s until 2021 identifying the significant knowledge gaps. These gaps include designing chemical additives for geothermal well cements and understanding the broad chemical composition of alternative cementitious materials. The review also proposes promising sources for potential geothermal well cements based on technologies in other harsh environments, such as marine and fire-prone applications.

Keywords: Ordinary portland cement; Alkali activated materials; Extreme environments; Class G; Silica flour; Supplementary cementitious materials; Calcium aluminate cement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212200260X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:161:y:2022:i:c:s136403212200260x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112347

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:161:y:2022:i:c:s136403212200260x