High yield, low cost, environmentally friendly process to recycle silicon solar panels: Technical, economic and environmental feasibility assessment
Pablo R. Dias,
Lucas Schmidt,
Nathan L. Chang,
Marina Monteiro Lunardi,
Rong Deng,
Blair Trigger,
Lucas Bonan Gomes,
Renate Egan and
Hugo Veit
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, vol. 169, issue C
Abstract:
The recycling of silicon photovoltaic modules is technically viable, but often not feasible economically due to reasons that vary from high processing cost to low waste volumes that do not justify investment cost. In this study, a novel, simple, cost-effective and environmentally friendly processing method is proposed. The process consists of module deframing, laminate shredding and material concentration using electrostatic separation. The latter outputs two fractions: a valuable mixture of silver, copper, aluminum and silicon, and a mixture of mostly glass, silicon and polymers. The valuable mixture accounts for only 2-3 wt% of the total module, which can be forwarded to the downstream industry for further refinement. This paper evaluates the technical aspects of the process (quantifies material separation, energy and time) while using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing to evaluate the environmental impacts and economic prospects, respectively. The results are compared to a full recovery alternative (FRELP) and to landfilling. Environmentally, a full recovery is preferred, followed by the proposed process, both of which have a net positive impact and are better than landfilling the whole module. Economic assessment shows the process has potential to be more profitable than FRELP i) at lower waste volumes (smaller than 4 kt/y), because of the smaller equipment capital cost, ii) if there is no market for the recovered glass, which is currently the case in many locations or iii) when the end-processing industry is located afar, since only the valuable mixture would require shipping.
Keywords: Crystalline silicon; Electrostatic separation; Environmental impact; Economic analysis; Recycling; Solar panel (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122007821
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:169:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122007821
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112900
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski
More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().