Ground-mounted photovoltaic power station site selection and economic analysis based on a hybrid fuzzy best-worst method and geographic information system: A case study Guilan province

Moein Besharati Fard, Parisa Moradian, Mohammadreza Emarati, Mehdi Ebadi, Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh and Jiří Jaromír Klemeŝ

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, vol. 169, issue C

Abstract: The applicability of a combined fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM) and geographic information system (GIS) was investigated to find the optimal location of a solar power plant site in Guilan province, which has a temperate and humid climate. Fifteen criteria were determined based on the guidelines and performance of photovoltaic (PV) systems and divided into four main categories: environmental, economic, technical, and social. The data were achieved from satellite images and organisations. The FBWM was applied to weight the criteria based on the opinion of the decision-maker, and then spatial analysis was done by GIS to find the potential sites for the solar power plant. The result of this study indicates that among the total area of Guilan province, about 0.74% is “the most suitable” region for solar power plants and 0.46, 0.54, 0.53, and 97.73% are in the class of “suitable”, “relatively suitable”, “least suitable” and “limited”. Four alternatives of A1, A2, A3 and A4 with an area of larger than 60,638 m2 which is the required area for a 10 MW solar power plant and a distance from power lines of less than 2 km, were selected. The techno-economic aspects were conducted among the four alternatives, which show that about a 35% increase of the feed-in tariff is necessary to decrease the payback period of the most economical site (A3) from 6.7 to 5 y, which encourages the investors of a PV power plant. Also, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission analysis indicates that the construction of a 10 MW power plant on A3 could prevent the release of 10,113 t of GHG into the atmosphere annually.

Keywords: Photovoltaic power station; Multi-criteria decision-making; Fuzzy best-worst method; Geographic information system; Financial analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122008048
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:169:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122008048

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112923

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().