EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Spatialized carbon-energy-water footprint of emerging coal chemical industry in China

Junjie Li

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, vol. 189, issue PA

Abstract: Concerns about energy security have driven the launch of the emerging coal chemical industry (ECCI) across China. However, the resulting spatially explicit carbon–energy–water footprint remains unclear. This study aims to comprehensively identify the spatial heterogeneity, distribution, and transfer characteristics of the carbon–energy–water footprint of the ECCI in China. An original spatialized accounting method based on a multi-flow multi-node model is developed to address the difficulty that spatially integrating large amounts of spatial data for ECCI projects and their upstream coal mines and power plants. The results indicate that the provincial intensities of the carbon footprint, energy footprint, and water footprint varied by −13.4–43.6 %, −7.2–1.8 %, and −22.6–59.5 % relative to the national averages, respectively. The three intensity types have quite different spatial heterogeneities, always showing an impossible trinity of carbon reduction, energy saving, and water conservation at the provincial level. The total national carbon footprint, energy footprint, and water footprint reached 280.20 Mt CO2-eq, 5.35 EJ, and 1155.18 Mt, respectively, of which more than 90 % were centrally distributed in North China, Northwest China, and East China. Interprovincial coal transport and electricity transmission driven by the spatial mismatch between the upstream and downstream processes together led to the transfer of 10.35 Mt CO2-eq of carbon footprint, 68.72 PJ of energy footprint, and 100.92 Mt of water footprint, whereas their respective contributions significantly varied by footprint type. These results provide spatial-specific knowledge and insights for layout optimization and sustainability enhancement for the ECCI across the country.

Keywords: Life cycle assessment; Carbon emission; Energy consumption; Water consumption; Multi-flow multi-node model; Coal conversion; Power plant; Coal mine (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123007773
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:189:y:2024:i:pa:s1364032123007773

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113919

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:189:y:2024:i:pa:s1364032123007773