Review and meta-analysis of Energy Return on Investment and environmental indicators of biofuels
Stavroula Papagianni,
Iñigo Capellán-Pérez,
Alexandros Adam and
Amandine Pastor
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, vol. 203, issue C
Abstract:
This study reviews the state-of-the-art (2014–2020) of biofuels from all generation categories, collecting information from 150 case studies to address concerns about the environmental sustainability and the potential of biofuels to contribute to the energy system without compromising its viability. Levels of Energy Return on Investment for refined products (EROIfinal) are used as reference: <3:1 (net sink for society) and >8:1 (better performance than global-average oil products). First-generation biofuels (from edible crops): none of the reviewed studies reported EROIfinal>8:1; most of the reviewed studies reported EROIfinal<3:1. Second-generation biofuels (from non-edible crops & residues): The EROIfinal can be higher compared to first-generation biofuels, although with large uncertainties/range. EROIfinal>3:1 in the case of herbaceous crops (∼4:1), and for crop and forest residues for certain feedstocks or under certain conditions; EROIfinal>8:1 in the case of agricultural residues under certain conditions. Third-generation biofuels (from algae): the technological advancements are slow; several challenges need to be overcome to reach large-scale production; reported EROIfinal close to 1:1. The collected data on environmental aspects for all generation types are fragmentary and insufficient to reach robust conclusions. Only 5 % of the reviewed case studies are based on pilot/demonstration scale plants, raising the question of potential discrepancies between theoretical and actual values. System boundaries and assumptions have a key role in the obtained results; therefore, the utilisation of standard protocols in the calculation of EROI across studies is essential. Studies should consider additional environmental metrics to address all sustainability concerns related to biofuel production.
Keywords: Biofuels; Bioenergy; Liquid biofuels; Gaseous biofuels; Solid biofuels; First-generation biofuels; Second-generation biofuels; Third-generation biofuels; Energy return on investment; EROI; EROIst; EROIfinal; EROIpou; EROIext; Greenhouse gas emissions; Biofuel technologies; Review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124004635
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004635
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114737
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski
More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().