Carbon footprints of production and use of liquid biofuels in Tanzania
Bilha Eshton and
Jamidu H.Y. Katima
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, vol. 42, issue C, 672-680
Abstract:
Tanzania being a prospective producer and exporter of liquid biofuels, information on local contribution of this sector to the environmental burden of the country is highly required in order to ensure sustainable liquid biofuels. Therefore, this paper evaluates a life cycle carbon footprint (or greenhouse (GHG) gas emissions) of liquid biofuels (biodiesel produced from jatropha oil and bioethanol produced from sugarcane molasses as alternative to fossil fuels in Tanzania. The functional unit (FU) of the study is defined as 1 Giga Joule (GJ) of output energy when a biofuel is combusted in the engine. The study found a positive GHG emissions related to biofuels. A carbon footprint (in CO2 equivalents) of jatropha biodiesel is 23.9kgFU−1 while that of molasses bioethanol is 17.4kgFU−1. Biodiesel combustion found to be a major contributor to carbon footprint by 41% which is attributed to methanol used during transesterification of jatropha oil followed by the use of chemical fertilizers (31%). Sugarcane production phase on the other hand found to be the highest contributor to carbon footprint of molasses bioethanol accounting for more than 80%. This is due to the use of diesel fuel, chemical fertilizers and burning of sugarcane prior to harvesting. Sensitivity analysis indicates that higher market prices of molasses increases carbon footprint of bioethanol same as higher market price of biodiesel. For the same energy output of 1GJ, molasses bioethanol observed to have lower carbon footprint than jatropha biodiesel by 27.2%. Both biofuels observed to save GHG emissions by >70% when used as fossil fuel replacement. The study recommends further research on socio-economic implication of large scale biofuel production; impact of land use change and land use competition and sustainability of biofuels to be carried out in near future.
Keywords: Biodiesel; Bioethanol; Greenhouse gas emissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211400865X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:672-680
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.040
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski
More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().