Greenhouse gas emissions from sugar cane ethanol: Estimate considering current different production scenarios in Minas Gerais, Brazil

Juan Carlos Claros Garcia and Eduardo Von Sperling

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, vol. 72, issue C, 1033-1049

Abstract: The studies of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of sugarcane ethanol production show few scenarios or, in most cases, a single representative scenario of the most common practices for ethanol production. However, the combination of the diverse sugarcane agricultural and industrialization practices lead to a wide variety of production scenarios. Current studies do not show the GHG emissions balance for all these scenarios. This issue is the aim of this study, which presents a GHG emissions balance of ethanol production considering 120 different scenarios related to current sugarcane agricultural and industrial practices in Brazil, with data of Minas Gerais. In order to obtain the ethanol production scenarios, different types of cultivation, fertilization, harvesting and different sugarcane crop cycles were combined. The scenarios were classified by groups, according to their GHG emission levels. The main characteristics of each group were analyzed in order to identify the factors that influence the performance of GHG emissions. The results show GHG emission levels ranging from 2489.38kg CO2eq∙ha−1∙yr−1 to 3289.95kg CO2eq∙ha−1∙yr−1, depending on the regime of agricultural practices present in each scenario. The factors that most favor the increase of GHG emission levels are: short sugarcane crop cycle combined with fertigation with stillage. These two factors were present in production scenarios that presented the highest levels of GHG emissions in this study. The factors that most favor the decrease of GHG emissions are: long sugarcane crop cycle, fertilization without stillage on ratoon and mechanical harvesting without sugarcane burning. All these factors were present in scenarios that presented the lowest GHG emissions. On the other hand, in certain agricultural conditions, the mechanical harvesting of green cane showed to be as polluting as manual harvesting of burnt cane. The differences between the types of cultivation showed no significant influence on the final balance of GHG emissions.

Keywords: Greenhouse gas emissions; Ethanol; Sugarcane; Biofuels; Climate change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117300382
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:72:y:2017:i:c:p:1033-1049

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.046

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().