Additional market incentives for abatement: An analysis of flue-gas desulfurization by-products
Qingxin He and
Jonathan Lee
Resource and Energy Economics, 2014, vol. 36, issue 2, 370-393
Abstract:
Energy and environmental regulations often result in by-products that can reduce compliance costs. This research evaluates a unique case in which the marketability of gypsum by-product produced from sulfur dioxide (SO2) scrubbing operations at coal-fired electric plants has a theoretically ambiguous impact on pollution emissions. Intuitively, the ability to market flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum provides incentives for electricity generating plants to operate their scrubbers more efficiently by providing gypsum revenues, and lowering gypsum disposal costs. Gypsum marketability also creates incentives for plants to burn coal with higher sulfur content in order to increase their gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) production. The overall impact of FGD gypsum marketability on boiler-level SO2 emissions is therefore the empirical question of interest. Electricity boiler-level fixed-effect estimations suggest annual SO2 emissions decline by 3494tons (39%) as a result of gypsum marketing. An upper bound on the total external benefits associated with the reduced SO2 emissions is estimated at $350.6 billion (2011$), or roughly 2.1% of the total benefits of the U.S. Clean Air Act (CAA) from 1990 to 2010.
Keywords: By-products; Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions; Scrubber; Gypsum; Clean Air Act (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L72 L94 Q48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765514000220
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:resene:v:36:y:2014:i:2:p:370-393
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.01.004
Access Statistics for this article
Resource and Energy Economics is currently edited by J. F. Shogren and S. Smulders
More articles in Resource and Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().