How optimal was the Sydney Metro contract?: Comparison with international best practice
Corinne Mulley (),
Nick Stevens and
Research in Transportation Economics, 2013, vol. 39, issue 1, 239-246
The New South Wales (NSW) government created the Sydney Metro Authority to design, build and operate a completely separate underground Metro rail system to supplement the existing public transport network in Sydney. By the time the NSW government abruptly cancelled the entire Metro project in early 2010, the Authority had conceived and designed a contract that was proceeding to procurement. This paper compares the elements of the proposed Sydney Metro contract to findings of the literature on optimal contracting and optimal incentives and on PPP best practice. The paper concludes that the Metro seems to have at least implicitly drawn fairly heavily on best practices and principles, but that its ultimate failure to be implemented is an instructive lesson about how operating environment can impede integration of useful knowledge and experience.
Keywords: PPP; Contracting; Private–public partnerships; Best practice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:retrec:v:39:y:2013:i:1:p:239-246
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_2&version=01
Access Statistics for this article
Research in Transportation Economics is currently edited by M. Dresner
More articles in Research in Transportation Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().