Profitability of technical stock trading: Has it moved from daily to intraday data?
Stephan Schulmeister ()
Review of Financial Economics, 2009, vol. 18, issue 4, 190-201
This paper investigates how technical trading systems exploit the momentum and reversal effects in the S&P 500 spot and futures market. When based on daily data, the profitability of 2580 technical models has steadily declined since 1960, and has been unprofitable since the early 1990s. However, when based on 30-minutes-data the same models produce an average gross return of 7.2% per year between 1983 and 2007. These results do not change substantially when trading is tested over eight subperiods. In particular, there is no clear trend of a declining profitability of technical stock trading based on 30-minutes-data. Those 25 models which performed best over the most recent subperiod produce a significantly higher gross return over the subsequent subperiod than all models. Between 2001 and 2007 the 2580 models perform worse than over the 1980s and 1990s. This result could be due to stock markets becoming recently more efficient or to stock price trends shifting from 30-minutes-prices to prices of higher frequencies.
Keywords: Technical; trading; Stock; price; dynamics; Momentum; effect; Reversal; effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (50) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Journal Article: Profitability of technical stock trading: Has it moved from daily to intraday data? (2009)
Working Paper: Profitability of Technical Stock Trading: Has it Moved from Daily to Intraday Data? (2008)
Working Paper: The Profitability of Technical Stock Trading has Moved from Daily to Intraday Data (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:revfin:v:18:y:2009:i:4:p:190-201
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Financial Economics is currently edited by T. K. Mukherjee and G. Whitney
More articles in Review of Financial Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().