How much can lack of marketability affect private equity fund values?

Axel Buchner

Review of Financial Economics, 2016, vol. 28, issue C, 35-45

Abstract: This paper derives an upper bound on the discounts for lack of marketability of private equity funds using option-pricing theory. The upper bound is a function of the volatility of the fund returns, of the (remaining) lifetime of the fund, of two parameters governing the speed of capital drawdowns and distributions, of the volatility of the stock market returns, and of the return correlation between the fund and the stock market. The model calibration and numerical analysis deliver several novel insights about how non-marketability affects the value: (i) upper boundary discounts are increasing functions of the return volatility of the fund, of the return volatility of the stock market, and of the average time over which a dollar committed remains invested in the fund; (ii) upper boundary discounts decrease non-linearly over the finite lifetime of a fund; (iii) estimated upper boundary discounts at the start of an average private equity fund equal $35.3 relative to $100 committed, which corresponds to an annual upper boundary return premium demanded for lack of marketability of around 7%; and (iv) estimated upper boundary discounts of venture and buyout funds are around the same magnitude, though, discounts of venture capital funds are slightly higher.

Keywords: Private equity funds; Marketability; Option-pricing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G13 G23 G24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058330015000609
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:revfin:v:28:y:2016:i:c:p:35-45

DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2015.10.002

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Financial Economics is currently edited by T. K. Mukherjee and G. Whitney

More articles in Review of Financial Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().