 How do firms respond to divergent ESG ratings? The perspective of green innovationZhongyi Xiao, Wai Yan Shum, Fujun Lai and Cheng Xiang Research in International Business and Finance, 2025, vol. 75, issue C Abstract: While firms commonly receive notably divergent Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings from different rating agencies, how they respond to these divergences remains largely unexplored. Using a sample of 2079 Chinese public firms during 2018–2022, we aim to answer this question by empirically investigating how ESG rating divergence affects firms' green innovation efforts. Our empirical results reveal a robust negative impact of such divergence on firms' future green innovation patent applications. The two-stage regression results based on the instrumental variable approach confirm that the impact is causal. Further analyses indicate that divergent ESG ratings inhibit green innovation efforts by increasing firms' capital costs and information asymmetry. Consistent with this mechanism, we document that the inhibitory effect is more pronounced for firms with greater financial constraints, poorer information environments, or larger stock or financial performance pressures. Keywords: ESG; ESG rating divergency; Green innovation; Capital costs; Information asymmetry (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:75:y:2025:i:c:s0275531924005348 DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102741 Access Statistics for this article Research in International Business and Finance is currently edited by T. Lagoarde Segot More articles in Research in International Business and Finance from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.