The paradoxes of city strategy practice: Why some issues become strategically important and others do not

Sara Brorström

Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2017, vol. 33, issue 4, 213-221

Abstract: Based on an in-depth study of a strategy initiative in the city of Gothenburg, Sweden, this article addresses the practice of city strategy making. Using methods inspired by ethnography, the article illustrates the complex task of drafting strategies in an urban context. The concept of paradox is used to highlight the tensions involved in being strategic in a city, tensions that can also affect the outcome, i.e., the strategy document. Examining organizational paradoxes is a way to deepen our understanding of why the content of a strategy document has certain qualities and why some issues become strategically important while others do not.

Keywords: City management; Strategy; Strategy as practice; Paradoxes; Politics; Sustainability; Ethnography (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522117302981
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:scaman:v:33:y:2017:i:4:p:213-221

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... me/872/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2017.06.004

Access Statistics for this article

Scandinavian Journal of Management is currently edited by Janne Tienari

More articles in Scandinavian Journal of Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().