How do people reduce compound lotteries?

Narges Hajimoladarvish

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), 2018, vol. 75, issue C, 126-133

Abstract: This paper provides experimental evidence for a rather important question: How do people reduce compound lotteries? As an alternative to the reduction of compound lotteries axiom of expected utility, I also test the compound independence axiom that can be employed by several decision theories. While the non-parametric test does not reject the compound independence axiom, I do not find support for evaluation of compound lotteries by the compound independence axiom through rank dependent utility that was used to motivate the axiom. The reduction of compound lotteries axiom is tested by two methods used in the literature. The validity of the axiom depends on the particular method used. While binary choices support the validity of the reduction axiom, there is no evidence of evaluation of compound lotteries through the axiom. Furthermore, out-of-sample predictions indicate that expected value is the best predictor of elicited certainty equivalents of compound lotteries. Interestingly, expected utility is the best predictor of elicited certainty equivalents for simple lotteries. The results suggest that subjects follow different mechanisms when evaluating compound lotteries as compared to simple ones.

Keywords: Compound lotteries; Reduction of compound lotteries axiom; Compound independence axiom; Rank dependent utility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804318302817
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:soceco:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:126-133

DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2018.06.002

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics) is currently edited by Pablo Brañas Garza

More articles in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics) from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().