Deciding to invest responsibly: Choice architecture and demographics in an incentivised retirement savings experiment

Robert Hoffmann (), Marie-Anne Cam and Adrian R. Camilleri

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), 2019, vol. 80, issue C, 219-230

Abstract: We report results from a framed field experiment with a realistic retirement savings simulation to examine two factors in socially responsible investment (SRI) decisions: characteristics of investors and the investment choice architecture. We find that default options, age and values are significant explanators while infographics, gender, education and income are not. Further, repeated decisions affect SRI negatively through donor fatigue and positively through windfall gains. Our results suggest SRI is significantly limited by the non-ethical default options pension providers commonly set. Conversely there is scope for nudging pension savers towards socially responsible investments using defaults.

Keywords: Socially responsible investment; Field experiment; Retirement savings (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804318303732
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:soceco:v:80:y:2019:i:c:p:219-230

DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2019.04.005

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics) is currently edited by Pablo Brañas Garza

More articles in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics) from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().