DEA-based Malmquist productivity indexes for understanding courts reform
Roberto Ippoliti and
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2018, vol. 62, issue C, 31-43
Currently there is no clear empirical evidence as to which the most appropriate reform to improve national judicial systems might be, i.e., whether it is better to implement a policy which focuses on judges and their incentives or, alternatively, a policy aimed at reorganizing the courts' structure.
Keywords: Judicial efficiency; Courts reform; Malmquist productivity indexes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:soceps:v:62:y:2018:i:c:p:31-43
Access Statistics for this article
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences is currently edited by Barnett R. Parker
More articles in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().