DEA-based Malmquist productivity indexes for understanding courts reform

Greta Falavigna, Roberto Ippoliti and Giovanni Ramello ()

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2018, vol. 62, issue C, 31-43

Abstract: Currently there is no clear empirical evidence as to which the most appropriate reform to improve national judicial systems might be, i.e., whether it is better to implement a policy which focuses on judges and their incentives or, alternatively, a policy aimed at reorganizing the courts' structure.

Keywords: Judicial efficiency; Courts reform; Malmquist productivity indexes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012116302956
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:soceps:v:62:y:2018:i:c:p:31-43

DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2017.07.001

Access Statistics for this article

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences is currently edited by Barnett R. Parker

More articles in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().