Economics at your fingertips  

Are public state libraries efficient? An empirical assessment using network Data Envelopment Analysis

Calogero Guccio (), Anna Mignosa and Ilde Rizzo ()

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2018, vol. 64, issue C, 78-91

Abstract: In Italy, public state libraries are multi-product organizations preserving ancient books of great historical relevance for future generations, and providing divisible services to the public. Hence, they may undertake different activities for conservation and use, which together constitute a network. This paper shows the importance of considering multi-process interactions in evaluating the overall performance of public state libraries and focuses on library operations and their sub-processes. It uses a network two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach to examine the relationship between the libraries' basic inputs, intermediate outputs and final outputs. The main result is that Italian public state libraries generally perform better in the first stage of conservation, but score poorly in the second stage of use. Some policy advice to improve the decision-making process follow

Keywords: Public state libraries; Historical collections; Efficiency; Trade-off; Network service estimator (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D24 Z11 Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences is currently edited by Barnett R. Parker

More articles in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2019-06-07
Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:64:y:2018:i:c:p:78-91