 The role of cultural explanations in 'somatization' and 'psychologization'Geoffrey M. White Social Science & Medicine, 1982, vol. 16, issue 16, 1519-1530 Abstract: Ethnographic and clinical research has described Chinese views of psycho-social distress as characterized by the 'somatization' of illness complaints and the 'underutilization' of mental health services. The hypothesis which states that such observed differences in American and Chinese illness behavior, including health-care decisions, derive in part from cultural modes of explaining illness and social behavior is termed the 'interpretative hypothesis'. The 'interpretive hypothesis' is explored by eliciting causal inferences about illness and behavioral difficulties from samples of (Caucasian) American and Hong Kong Chinese students at the University of Hawaii. Explicit procedures are developed for the reliable identification of elements of meaning in explanations given by the two groups. Comparative analysis gives limited support to the 'interpretive hypothesis' in showing a more 'psychologized' American model of illness in comparison with the 'situational' explanations given by the Hong Kong Chinese. The contrasts in common sense explanations offered by each sample suggest that these differences are related to implicit cultural modes of interpreting social behavior which have been characterized by other researchers with oppositions such as 'individual-centered' vs 'situation-centered', and 'internal' vs 'external' locus of control. These speculations, however, are tempered by the finding that the Hong Kong Chinese respondents make relatively greater use of personality attributions (a kind of psychological construct) in explaining interpersonal problems. This result indicates that global characterizations of explanatory modes should be limited to specific domains of discourse. Date: 1982 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:16:p:1519-1530 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.