Working conditions and health: Social epidemiology, patterns of stress and change

Wilfried Karmaus

Social Science & Medicine, 1984, vol. 19, issue 4, 359-372

Abstract: This paper does not attempt to review stress research but to highlight contrary positions. Arguments about central questions such as exposure vs disposition, social factors vs the constitutional make-up has lead to refinements in methodology. However, investigations seldom do justice to these ideals discussed. It should be a conditio sine qua non when estimating the effects of dispositional factors to consider exposure which could change dispositions or interact with them. Also it becomes obvious that when investigating working life a limited view of risks factors only must faile because job latitudes and support are of salient importance. Concerning changes in working life our methodological flights of fancy are confronted with the limited horizon and world of a mole.

Date: 1984
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90193-X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:4:p:359-372

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().