The economic evaluation of clinical practice

Ron Akehurst

Social Science & Medicine, 1985, vol. 20, issue 10, 1037-1040

Abstract: This paper considers a series of questions: why economists are concerned with evaluating clinical practice; whether economic evaluation has much impact on clinical practice; possible reasons for the observed lack of impact; and the future role of evaluation. The prime reasons for the interest of economists are that the health service absorbs substantial resources and that clinicians have a major role in directing their use. Evaluations that have been carried out have had a limited impact on practice. This is because of weaknesses in the studies themselves; the widespread lack of receptivity to economic arguments found among clinicians; and the absence of incentives to encourage clinicians to be concerned with cost-effectiveness. The conclusion is drawn that major changes in clinician behaviour will not be brought about by evaluation alone. A major role for evaluation lies in educating clinicians to use economic concepts and modes of thinking in their day-to-day practice.

Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90260-6
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:10:p:1037-1040

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().