Why me? Attributions and adjustment by cancer patients and their mates at two stages in the disease process

Carolyn Cook Gotay

Social Science & Medicine, 1985, vol. 20, issue 8, 825-831

Abstract: This research investigated how cancer patients at early and advanced stage disease (N = 73) and their mates (N = 39) attributed causality for the disease, their levels of adjustment and the relationship between attributions and adjustment. Data were collected through semi-structured home interviews. Results indicated that the largest numbers of individuals cited chance as the cause of the cancer, although many reported that they had not asked themselves the question, 'Why me?'. Adjustment measures indicated, in general, more similarities than differences between groups. Attributions were not significant predictors of adjustment. It is suggested that not making strong causal attributions may be adaptive for cancer patients and their families.

Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90337-5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:8:p:825-831

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().