The weakness of the strong: Examining the squeaky-wheel effect of hospital violence in China

Junqiang Liu, Hui Zhou, Lingrui Liu and Chunxiao Wang

Social Science & Medicine, 2020, vol. 245, issue C

Abstract: Hospital violence has become a worldwide issue that disturbs health care systems. China is in a particular dilemma between meeting the healthcare demand of 1.39 billion residents and ensuring the safety of 12.3 million health professionals. Drawing on data from an administrative survey, we presented the types and distribution of disruptive behaviors, as well as the summary statistics of 225 medical disputes that took place from 2012 to 2013 in Z city. Logit and OLS regression analyses show that disruptive behaviors, characterized by the number of protest participants and the length of protest, can significantly predict whether the claimant receives compensation and the amount of compensation. All else equal, a one-person increase in the number of participants is associated with 3.94% higher odds of getting compensated, whereas a one-day increase in the length of protest is associated with a 1.03% increase in the odds of receiving compensation. Further analyses show that the link between disruptive behaviors and compensation outcomes is due to the involvement of the state, which tends to press hospitals to pay when substantial violence is present. Chinese government's overwhelming emphasis on social stability gives protestors leverage against hospitals, which can be summarized as “the squeaky wheel gets the grease.” Ironically, the sensitivity of Chinese government towards social stability becomes a weakness of its own. Government's active intervention to reach a peace-oriented goal will incentivize patients to resort to violence in pursuit of compensation. This study has implications for understanding the Chinese government's logic of addressing social problems that range from hospital violence, labor disputes, land disputes to demolition compensation and civil petitions.

Keywords: China; Hospital violence; Physician-patient relationship; Medical disputes; Safety in medicine (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619307129
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:245:y:2020:i:c:s0277953619307129

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112717

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().