Do health professionals agree on the parenting potential of pregnant women?

D.P. Sommerfeld and J.R. Hughes

Social Science & Medicine, 1987, vol. 24, issue 3, 285-288

Abstract: Although retrospective studies have suggested that the signs of potential parenting problems are present well before the child is born, successful prenatal screening is infrequent or absent in most clinical settings. For the most part, this lack of screening reflects the inherent difficulties in developing and using practical and reliable tools of assessment. Problems of reliability suggest that professionals from related disciplines often differ in their evaluations of clinical samples. This pilot study was designed to determine whether 12 professionals, four from each of three health disciplines concerned with child-abuse detection (nursing, medicine and social work), could agree on parenting risk status of 15 pregnant women. Assessment protocols were comprised of the most frequently cited predictive signs of poor parenting. Each rater evaluated the transcript of 15 prenatal interviews. The results indicate inconsistencies in rating both among and within the professional groups. These inconsistencies extended not only to the individual criteria from which the final scores were derived, but also to the total risk status. Even though specific instructions were given for the use of risk criteria, the raters often violated the instructions for coding in favor of their own idiosyncratic judgements.

Keywords: interprofessional; agreement; reliability; parenting; child; abuse (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90055-4
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:3:p:285-288

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().