Serving on multiple fronts: A grounded theory model of complex decision-making in military mental health care

Erika L. King and David L. Snowden

Social Science & Medicine, 2020, vol. 250, issue C

Abstract: Military mental health providers must navigate multiple competing professional boundaries when delivering care in complex cases. Currently no clear policy exists to balance clinical professional obligations to do no harm with potentially-contradictory military policies. Thusly, military providers may face Catch-22 situations where they must choose to seemingly neglect either their duty to the military or their duty to clinical professional standards.

Keywords: Military; Mental health; Role strain; Grounded theory; Qualitative; Ethics; Complex care; Decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620300848
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:250:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620300848

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112865

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().