International and temporal comparative analysis of UK and US drug safety regulation in changing political contexts
John Abraham and
Courtney Davis
Social Science & Medicine, 2020, vol. 255, issue C
Abstract:
Modern UK drug regulation began in 1971. In view of significant neo-liberal political reforms to drug regulation in the UK and US since the early 1990s, this article compares the performance of UK and US drug safety regulation during both 1971–1992 and 1993–2004, by investigating drug safety withdrawals (DSWs). Combined quantitative and comprehensive qualitative regulatory case history methodology is employed to explain comparative trends in DSWs and relate them to the key claims of central regulatory theories. It is found that there was a dramatic increase in DSWs in the US during 1993–2004 compared with 1971–1992, and a major increase in the extent to which drugs withdrawn on safety grounds in the UK were left on the US market. Analysis reveals that these findings are best explained by changes in institutional regulatory culture at FDA, consequent upon neo-liberal reforms during 1993–2004, which meant that US regulators adopted more permissive interpretations of safety signals and associated risk-benefit assessments leading to more unsafe drugs being approved on to the US market than during 1971–1992. Changes in the UK are less marked because it already embraced a relatively permissive regulatory culture during 1971–1992 and neo-liberal reforms post-1992 were more attenuated. It is concluded that the changes support corporate bias theory, and that, to improve patient protection, drug safety regulation in the UK and US should shift direction towards the US regulatory model of 1971–92.
Keywords: Pharmaceutical regulation; Drug safety withdrawals; Neo-liberal reforms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620302240
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:255:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620302240
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113005
Access Statistics for this article
Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian
More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().