“It makes it more real”: Examining ambiguous fetal meanings in abortion care

Andréa Becker and Lena R. Hann

Social Science & Medicine, 2021, vol. 272, issue C

Abstract: The role of fetal development in abortion work is unresolved, mirroring a broader cultural ambivalence regarding the fetus. The collective, cultural notion of fetuses tends to lie on a dichotomy between “clump of cells” and “baby,” with little public attention to the realities of fetal development during all stages of pregnancy. This tension is exacerbated by an absence of medically accurate images of aborted fetal tissue available to lay audiences. In this paper, we examine how independent abortion providers manage contradictory messages surrounding the fetus when providing patient-centered pregnancy tissue viewing (PCV). More specifically, we investigate how providers navigate public and private understandings of the fetus in their healthcare provision amidst a void of nuanced fetal imagery. Through interviews with 25 independent abortion providers in the United States, we analyze the discursive framings providers employ to make sense of the fetus and provision of PCV. Using a symbolic interactionism framework, we grouped results into three overarching themes: tensions in language, the impact of gestation as de- or re-stigmatizing, and looking as “making it more real.” Our findings support the notion that the fetus is largely socially constructed, mutable, and variant across individuals, context, and time; our findings also highlight abortion providers' ability to hold nuanced and sometimes conflicting thoughts and feelings about fetuses while providing patient-centered care. This study addresses a largely overlooked practice within medical sociology and furthers our understanding of how cultural narratives shape the provision and meanings of patient-centered care, the professional socialization of healthcare workers, and the patient-provider interaction.

Keywords: Abortion; Reproduction; Culture; Fetus; Symbolic interaction; Patient centered tissue viewing; Stigma; Dangertalk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362100068X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:272:y:2021:i:c:s027795362100068x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113736

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().