Biocultural belief and iodine prophylaxis

Renate Lellep Fernandez

Social Science & Medicine, 1988, vol. 27, issue 6, 587-596

Abstract: Iodine prophylaxis, the most cost-effective public health intervention as yet known, has been slow to be adopted even where goiter and cretinism--the most common expression of iodine deficiency disorders (IDD)--have long been known to be endemic and where underdevelopment cannot explain the absence of prophylaxis. Belief in the hereditary causation of IDD tends to be high in societies where familial goiter is common and endogamy is high. This belief props up opposition to prophylaxis, making dietary intervention appear both useless and wasteful. The examination of genealogies (pedigrees) alongside dietary history can erode support for hereditary causation. This can be done by charting the incidence of IDD against social and dietary changes.

Keywords: iodine; deficiency; disorders; (IDD); prophylaxis; belief; as; obstacle; hereditary; causation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90006-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:6:p:587-596

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().