Comparison of three indices of relative income deprivation in predicting health status

Krisztina Gero, Aki Yazawa, Naoki Kondo, Masamichi Hanazato, Katsunori Kondo and Ichiro Kawachi

Social Science & Medicine, 2022, vol. 294, issue C

Abstract: Relative income deprivation (RID) is a known risk factor for poor health. Previous research has proposed several measures to assess RID, e.g., Income Rank and the Yitzhaki Index. Hounkpatin et al. (2020) presented a new approach – the CR˜i index – to account for the observation that individuals are more sensitive to the differences in incomes of others who are closer to them, rather than to comparisons with incomes of others far above them. Using a Japanese nationwide cohort of older adults (n = 62,438; mean [SD] age: 73.0 [5.6] years), this study compared the performance of alternative indices of RID in predicting health outcomes (depressive symptoms, functional capacity, and self-rated health), as well as the use of alternative CR˜i index weights (α weight range: −0.9 to 0.9). When 0<α<1, higher income differences lead to a more significant increase in relative deprivation, while when −1< α <0, excessively high incomes contribute less to the relative deprivation of lower income individuals in the same reference group. Results showed that all measures of relative income deprivation were associated with deteriorating mental and physical health among older Japanese adults. However, while the CR˜i index consistently outperformed the Yitzhaki Index, this did not hold true invariably when compared to the Income Rank – depending on the health outcome and the reference group. Also, while negative α parameters showed a good statistical fit in most models, the findings were not conclusive – the best-fitting CR˜i weight parameters ranged from −0.9 to 0.9. Therefore, a clear direction for the contribution of higher incomes to relative deprivation could not be established based on the study population.

Keywords: Relative deprivation; Income inequality; Depression; Functional capacity; Self-rated health; Gerontology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622000259
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:294:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622000259

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114722

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().