Comparisons between the self-assessed and observer-assessed presence and severity of colds

Sally Macintyre and Colin Pritchard

Social Science & Medicine, 1989, vol. 29, issue 11, 1243-1248

Abstract: The hypotheses that self-reported symptoms are a valid proxy for physicians' ratings, and that people with different social characteristics mayvary in their recognition and evaluation of symptoms, were tested on volunteers attending the MRC Common Cold Unit. Eleven-hundred volunteers assessed the presence and severity of colds at the end of their stay at the unit, using the same two measures as a trained clinical observer (all ratings were double blind). On both measures there was an extremely high correlation between self- and observer-assessments, a finding encouraging for those using self-reports in community surveys. Although this high level of agreement was found within all the age, sex, occupational class and marital status groups, men were significantly more likely than women to over-rate their symptoms in comparison with the clinical observer. No such differences in over-rating were found by age, class or marital status. This finding of a sex difference in the tendency to over-rate physical symptoms is of major significance to theories of illness behaviour, and is particularly convincing because it is based on a double-blind comparison between self-reports and assessments made by a doctor.

Keywords: self-assessed; morbidity; sex; differences; symptom; severity; colds (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90063-4
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:11:p:1243-1248

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().