A comparison of attitudes and practices of episiotomy among obstetrical practitioners in New Mexico

Susan Brandt Graham, Valerian Catanzarite, Judith Bernstein and Frances Varela-Gittings

Social Science & Medicine, 1990, vol. 31, issue 2, 191-201

Abstract: The routine use of episiotomy is a subject of considerable controversy. To delineate attitudes and practices, we surveyed various groups of obstetrical practitioners in New Mexico. Routine use was favored most by obstetricians, less by family practitioners, less yet by nurse midwives and least by lay midwives. Many of the reasons given both for and against routine use were the same, underscoring the lack of scientific data and prospective studies of episiotomy and its effects.

Keywords: episiotomy; childbirth; women's; health; issues; attitudes; and; practices; obstetrical; practice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90061-V
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:2:p:191-201

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().