Regulating teratogenicity as a health risk

Nanda Gilden and Henk Bodewitz

Social Science & Medicine, 1991, vol. 32, issue 10, 1191-1198

Abstract: The development of scientific knowledge and regulatory policy with respect to teratogenicity is reviewed. The current debate on the definition of teratogenicity and on perceived risks, as illustrated by the Dutch Health Council report on teratogenicity, originates from the increased regulatory demands and from incoherent development of teratology as a scientific discipline. Barriers in the development of knowledge are discussed with respect to their consequences for regulatory policy. Special emphasis is given to behavioural effects, to the rise of monitoring and registration systems, and to epidemiological research. From a regulatory perspective, knowledge on the public perception of teratogenicity as a health risk is inadequate. It is concluded that the present situation is ambivalent and poses a real problem for regulatory policy. The positions vary from refining the original and very strict definition stressing severity and low risk, to stressing the need for a more comprehensive definition; in the latter case teratogenicity is seen as a top of the iceberg problem to be treated as part of the reproductive toxicity health issue.

Keywords: teratogenicity; reproductive; toxicity; behavioural; teratogenicity; risk; management; public; perception; regulation; scientific; development; overview; risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90096-U
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:10:p:1191-1198

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().