Why are we weighting? A critical examination of the use of item weights in a health status measure

Crispin Jenkinson

Social Science & Medicine, 1991, vol. 32, issue 12, 1413-1416

Abstract: There is currently much interest in the measurement of self reported health status. A number of health status measures have been designed. However, such questionnaires are often long and complicated, or are disease specific. The most famous generic British health status instrument is the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) which is a short questionnaire designed for ease of completion. However, this paper addresses a number of related issues concerning the weights attached to particular items on this questionnaire. It is argued that the weighting of items by Thurstone's method of paired comparisons is inappropriate and can lead to logically inconsistent results.

Keywords: Nottingham; Health; Profile; weighting; Thurstone; scaling; health; status (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90202-N
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:12:p:1413-1416

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().