Explanation in medical geography: Evidence and epistemology

David Bennett

Social Science & Medicine, 1991, vol. 33, issue 4, 339-346

Abstract: This paper discusses some basic questions about evidence, proof, argument, and explanation in medical geography. The main objective is an evaluation of the underlying epistemological robustness of the field and the cogency of its claims to possess knowledge. It is argued that the constraints imposed by inductive and deductive reasoning prevent the formulation of causal explanations of a kind likely to satisfy those potential external consumers of medical geography's output who unreflectively apply a criterion of certainty. It is suggested that all forms of empirically relevant explanation will fall short of this standard, which must, therefore be relaxed to a criterion of adequacy as developed by the American Pragmatists, especially William James.

Keywords: epistemology; causation; explanation; certainty; adequacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90314-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:4:p:339-346

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().