Navigating payment and policy barriers to gender-affirming care for transmasculine individuals: A qualitative study and policy assessment

Alexa B. D'Angelo, Michelle Dearolf, Arjee Restar, Emma K. Tsui, Naomi Zewde and Christian Grov

Social Science & Medicine, 2025, vol. 366, issue C

Abstract: Over the past decade, access to and insurance coverage for gender-affirming medical and surgical treatment for transgender (trans) individuals in the U.S. has improved. Despite this, trans individuals continue to experience insurance-related barriers to gender-affirming care (GAC)—and in particular, transmasculine individuals may face gender-specific barriers resulting from regulations on masculinizing hormones. In this study, we interviewed transmasculine individuals from across the U.S. about their gender-affirming care experiences with a focus on insurance, payment and policy-related barriers to care. Interviews were conducted via video-conferencing software, analyzed using a codebook approach to thematic analysis, and contextualized within a broader analysis of the policy landscape dictating coverage for gender-affirming care. Participants reported insurance denials for gender-affirming care, as well as challenges with prior-authorization requirements, letter requirements, restrictive formulary lists and other challenges that complicated and/or barred access to care. Many discussed adaptive strategies to these challenges, which included utilizing community resources and knowledge, as well as receiving material support from family, friends, and partners, and developing technical and interpersonal savvy skills in response to insurance challenges. Participants expressed a range of emotional responses with regard to payment and related challenges, from annoyance and frustration to hopelessness. Our findings illuminate the persisting challenges that transmasculine individuals face when attempting to access and pay for gender-affirming care, despite improvements in insurance coverage and legal protections in recent years resulting from the Bostock ruling by the Supreme Court and the expansion of the ACA’s Section 1557.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011201
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624011201

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117666

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().