Comparison of methods for anchoring latent values on the full health-dead utility scale

Thomas G. Poder and Hosein Ameri

Social Science & Medicine, 2025, vol. 383, issue C

Abstract: A key challenge in ordinal methods is to anchor estimated health utility values onto the full health-dead scale. This study assessed five methods of anchoring.

Keywords: Ranking; Discrete choice experiments; Composite time trade-off; QALY; Health utilities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008251
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625008251

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118494

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().