 What is needed to claim adequacy in health services?Hans S. Falck Social Science & Medicine, 1994, vol. 39, issue 9, 1395-1403 Abstract: The answer to the question in the title of this essay is fairly readily available and can be articulated by listing those attributes that spell out adequacy in health services. A series of other concepts are presented to highlight methods of analysis in judging adequacy. These fall into two categories, those value statement that give meaning to the question to begin with as well as to its answers; and those of more mechanical significance. The first appear in the form of general principles, having to do with means, ends and the maintenance of human life; the worth of human life and common ownership of resources; and overriding contradictions with health-oriented life. The second--mechanics and techniques in judging the presence or lack of health services--are addressed by the concepts of conditionality and prioritization. Examples are provided from the current health planning efforts in the United States as viewed by a professional organization, by the Clinton administration's proposal for adequate health care, and finally, those offered by the Republican party. Keywords: social; values; conditionality; prioritization; adequacy; health; services (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:9:p:1395-1403 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.