 'Parental incompetence' and 'selective neglect': Blaming the victim in child survivalRuthbeth Finerman Social Science & Medicine, 1995, vol. 40, issue 1, 5-13 Abstract: The Child Survival Revolution has produced inconsistent results in reducing global infant and child morbidity and mortality rates. Several recent studies employ concepts of 'parental incompetence' and 'selective neglect' as catch-phrases to account for variations in the outcome of family health programs. This concept shifts liability for illness from health agencies and providers to beneficiaries. It associates program failure with noncompliance resulting from parental ignorance or indifference to the welfare of offspring. This paper presents data which support a view of parents as concerned and pro-active health seekers whose parenting standards sometimes conflict with those of external health agents, and whose caretaking decisions sometimes force them to weigh concerns for individual children against demands of the family as a whole. Implications of parental accountability for child survival are discussed as they shape research and health policy. Keywords: child; survival; parental; competence; health; policy; latin; america (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:1:p:5-13 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.