EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is patient-controlled analgesia controlled by the patient?

Neil Taylor, George M. Hall and Peter Salmon

Social Science & Medicine, 1996, vol. 43, issue 7, 1137-1143

Abstract: Using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after surgery, a patient can obtain pain-relieving injections of morphine without the direct involvement of a nurse or doctor. The present study was a response to the conventional view that patients value PCA because of the control which it affords them over their own treatment. Twenty-six patients underwent semi-structured interviews postoperatively, shortly after discontinuation of PCA. Responses were examined qualitatively to identify recurring themes in patients' experience of PCA. Negative as well as positive evaluation was found. PCA was only rarely described as a way of gaining control over analgesia and, in general, this was not valued. Instead, PCA was valued as a way to avoid the difficulty of disclosing pain or securing pain relief within the usual nurse-patient relationship. In turn, PCA strained the nurse-patient relationship where it impeded either the patient's or the nurse's wish for the nurse to take responsibility for pain relief. The results showed that the professionally and theoretically constructed concept of PCA as a method of self-control over pain is inconsistent with patients' experience of it.

Keywords: patient-controlled; analgesia; control; pain; nurse-patient; relationship (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(96)00056-1
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:7:p:1137-1143

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:7:p:1137-1143