 Identity, ideology and inequality: Methodologies in medical anthropology, Guatemala 1950-1995Bruce Barrett Social Science & Medicine, 1997, vol. 44, issue 5, 579-587 Abstract: This paper sketches the history of medical anthropology in Guatemala, focusing on how investigations carried out during the 1950s served as methodological and ideological foundations for subsequent work. Problematic examples from the literature and from the author's experience are used to provide insight into the nature of the anthropologist's role in applied research and development. For example, medical anthropologists are often hired to help navigate the gulf between the ideological identities of indigenous peoples and those of biomedical researchers and international development specialists. Instead of recognizing the inherently ethical nature of this work and acting accordingly, many anthropologists have adopted a detached, "scientific" and impossibly value-free perspective. This paper proposes a transformation of this role into one that (1) maintains an independent and critical relationship to mainstream science, (2) elaborates and advocates the indigenous agenda, and (3) adopts an explicitly value-filled ideology, methodology and theoretical framework. Keywords: Guatemala; anthropology; methodology; ideology; identity; ethics (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:44:y:1997:i:5:p:579-587 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.