 Paradoxes of GP fundholding: Contracting for community health services in the British National Health ServiceGareth Williams, Rob Flynn and Susan Pickard Social Science & Medicine, 1997, vol. 45, issue 11, 1669-1678 Abstract: The expansion of GP fundholding (GPFH) is central to the British government's attempt to maintain the revolution under way in the National Health Service (NHS). Evaluations of the NHS reforms have portrayed GPFH as an important mechanism for competition, and GPFH's bargaining power is reported to have secured significant changes in health service provision. However, these developments have been acknowledged to be less applicable in relation to community health services (CHS) than acute hospital services. On the basis of case studies of the process of contracting for CHS, GPFHs are shown to display ambivalent and sometimes contradictory views which have to be related to broader policy developments in general practice and primary care. Although this paper focuses on the British situation, many of the issues raised by reforms in primary and community health services have implications for developments in other Western health care systems. Keywords: primary; care; GP; fundholding; community; health; services (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:11:p:1669-1678 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.