 Survival vs. quality of life: a study of the Israeli public priorities in medical careAmir Shmueli Social Science & Medicine, 1999, vol. 49, issue 3, 297-302 Abstract: Public opinion has become one of the primary inputs in setting priorities, rationing and allocating health resources. The present study focuses on the priorities of the Israeli public aged 45-75 in allocating scarce medical resources between prolonging survival (the 'Rule of Rescue') and preventing a severe and permanent disability (quality of life). The findings indicate that the 'Rule of Rescue' is dominant for more than a quarter of the population even when death is postponed by only one month. More than a tenth of the population are ready to adopt prioritization by lottery. Economic condition, gender and health status have no effect on priority choices. The main determinants of the choices are age and religiosity, with older individuals more likely to choose random prioritization and religious people tending to prefer saving life even when the opportunity costs are high. Keywords: Equity; Public; opinion; Priorities; Rationing; Medical; care; Allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:3:p:297-302 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.