Formative research on adolescent and adult perceptions of risk factors for breast cancer

Kami J. Silk, Elizabeth Bigbsy, Julie Volkman, Catherine Kingsley, Charles Atkin, Merissa Ferrara and Leigh-Anne Goins

Social Science & Medicine, 2006, vol. 63, issue 12, 3124-3136

Abstract: This study uses the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a framework to guide formative research of the lay public's perceptions of risks associated with breast cancer. Data were collected from adolescent females and adult females across four counties in Michigan, US. Ten focus groups (N=91) were conducted and analyzed with a coding scheme based on the HBM. Participants' responses to focus group questions (N=5168 thought units) reveal beliefs about severity, susceptibility, and efficacy pertaining to breast cancer, nutrition, activity, environment, and the role of government and industry. Chi-squares examined the distribution of statements across categories between adult females and adolescent females. Results revealed that both adolescent and mother groups recognized gender and heredity as relevant risk factors related to susceptibility, and detection as a strategy to decrease severity of breast cancer through early treatment. Beliefs about environmental factors were characterized by uncertainty for both groups. Also, while adolescent girls communicated more about efficacy issues, mothers focused significantly more than adolescent girls on the role of government and industry in breast cancer prevention and treatment. Representative qualitative thought units are included based on their frequency, salience, and relevance to HBM message design guidelines. Formative research is the first phase in the development of health campaigns, informing the creation of health messages for target audiences.

Keywords: Breast; cancer; Environment; Adolescent; beliefs; Formative; research; Focus; groups; USA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(06)00412-6
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:12:p:3124-3136

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().