Effects of increased commitment on reputation and status: Evidence from NCAA Division I universities
Mary Dana Laird,
Michael Hutchinson and
Sport Management Review, 2017, vol. 20, issue 4, 395-407
Reputation and status are important concepts for organizations because their various constituencies form perceptions, images, and interpretations that are consequential. We collected data from a sample of 54 universities that changed their NCAA classification during a thirty-year period. As often promised by university administrators, our results suggest that increasing the level of commitment by changing athletic classifications has a direct positive effect on the university’s athletic reputation, academic status, and endowment. We find a positive relationship between academic status and the university endowment, although it is not statistically significant. Athletic reputation correlates positively and significantly with university endowment, but the marginal effect of improving one spot in the Sagarin ratings corresponds to only a $300,000 increase in the endowment. Based on these results, we provide a discussion that offers implications of these findings as well as directions for future research.
Keywords: Reputation; Status; Commitment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:spomar:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:395-407
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier. ... 716936/bibliographic
Access Statistics for this article
Sport Management Review is currently edited by Tracy Taylor
More articles in Sport Management Review from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().