EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

No arbitrage and lead–lag relationships

Takaki Hayashi and Yuta Koike

Statistics & Probability Letters, 2019, vol. 154, issue C, -

Abstract: The existence of time-lagged cross-correlations between the returns of a pair of assets, which is known as the lead–lag relationship, is a well-known stylized fact in financial econometrics. Recently some continuous-time models have been proposed to take account of the lead–lag relationship. Such a model does not follow a semimartingale as long as the lead–lag relationship is present, so it admits an arbitrage without market frictions. In this paper we show that they are free of arbitrage if we take account of market frictions such as the presence of minimal waiting time on subsequent transactions or transaction costs.

Keywords: Arbitrage; Cheridito class; Conditional full support; Discrete trading; Lead–lag relationship; Transaction costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715219301646
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:stapro:v:154:y:2019:i:c:1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2019.06.006

Access Statistics for this article

Statistics & Probability Letters is currently edited by Somnath Datta and Hira L. Koul

More articles in Statistics & Probability Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2020-02-18
Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:154:y:2019:i:c:1