Experimental comparison of least-squares and maximum likelihood methods in factor analysis

Masamori Ihara and Masashi Okamoto

Statistics & Probability Letters, 1985, vol. 3, issue 6, 287-293

Abstract: Three popular methods to estimate the unknown parameters in the factor analysis model, simple (SLS) and weighted (WLS) least-squares methods and the maximum likelihood method (ML), are compared by a Monte Carlo study. The experiments were conducted with 200 replications for every combination of levels of the following three conditions: method (3 levels), sample size (3 levels) and uniquenesses (2 levels). It was found that SLS performed most favorably when the sample size is relatively small and unique variances are relatively large. WLS and ML proved to be rather alike.

Keywords: factor; analysis; least-squares; method; maximum; likelihood; method; Monte; Carlo; study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(85)90057-4
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:stapro:v:3:y:1985:i:6:p:287-293

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Statistics & Probability Letters is currently edited by Somnath Datta and Hira L. Koul

More articles in Statistics & Probability Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().