An example concerning the likelihood function

Michael Evans

Statistics & Probability Letters, 1989, vol. 7, issue 5, 417-418

Abstract: A simple example is presented which shows that interpreting likelihood ratios as relative degrees of support can be very misleading. It also demonstrates that the maximum likelihood estimator can be an exceedingly poor estimator.

Keywords: likelihood; ratios; frequentist; theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(89)90097-7
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:stapro:v:7:y:1989:i:5:p:417-418

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
https://shop.elsevie ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

Access Statistics for this article

Statistics & Probability Letters is currently edited by Somnath Datta and Hira L. Koul

More articles in Statistics & Probability Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().